Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA interviewed R1’s RP, who stated that on 8/26/22, R1 was picked up from the facility by a family member to go to speech therapy and there was no indication R1 had fallen. Per RP, R1 also did not inform them of the fall. RP stated that later the same day, R1 informed another family member of the fall, and the family member then informed RP. RP stated R1 requested to go to the hospital, and they transported R1 to the hospital, where R1 was diagnosed with a hip fracture. During their interview, R1 confirmed they had sustained an unwitnessed fall at the facility, while attempting to get to the restroom. R1 stated they became dizzy and fell but did not alert staff to the fall and staff were unaware they had fallen. Per R1, they did not alert staff or ask for help because they did not need staff assistance and were able to get back on their feet independently. Due to conflicting information received during interviews conducted, LPA is unable to determine if resident was not assisted in a timely manner. Although the above allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87506(a)Type A

    The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff.This requirement is not met as evidence by: During the course of complaint investigation, facility was unable to provide any documentation pertaining to R1, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87506(e)Type B

    Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident.This requirement is not met as evidence by: During the course of complaint investigation, facility was unable to provide any documentation pertaining to R1, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 29, 2024 inspection of IN R GREAT HANDS - MONTEVIDEO?

This was a complaint inspection of IN R GREAT HANDS - MONTEVIDEO on February 29, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IN R GREAT HANDS - MONTEVIDEO on February 29, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.