Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

PHAMILY HOME ELDERLY CARE 2License 3060060342 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Per AD he is not able to accept R1 back into the facility due to many complaints about his inappropriate behaviors toward staff. AD reported that R1 did not received an Eviction notice and stated that he told the Hospital to find a new place for R1. Based on the interviews which were conducted and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the following allegation: Staff abandoned resident at hospital is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative and a copy of this report along with the Appeal Rights were provided at the time of this visit.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87457(a)(c)Type A

    (a)(c)(1)Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs in comparison with the admission criteria specified in Section 87455, Acceptance and Retention Limitations. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records reviewed LPA did not observed a Pre-Admission Appraisal for R1. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87224(a)(3)(4)Type B

    87224 Eviction Procedures (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required...(3)Failure of the resident to comply with general policies of the facility. (4) If, after admission, it is determined that the resident has a need not previously identified and a reappraisal has been conducted pursuant to Section 87463... Based on record review and interviews conducted R1 was not issued a 30-Day Eviction notice. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted AD reported he is not able to take R1 back into the facility. Per AD he told the Hospital to find a new place for R1. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 24, 2024 inspection of PHAMILY HOME ELDERLY CARE 2?

This was a complaint inspection of PHAMILY HOME ELDERLY CARE 2 on September 24, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PHAMILY HOME ELDERLY CARE 2 on September 24, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a)(c)(1)Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.