Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IVY AT WELLINGTON, THELicense 3060062222 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Per review of R1's medical records the facility received a fax from R1's current physician requesting the medication of Oxybutynin to be tapered off and then discontinued, the fax was received on 07/19/2023. Per review of medication administration records (MAR) Oxybutynin was tapered off and eventually discontinued in August of 2023, review of December 2023 MAR the medication is refilled by R1's former physician and continued to be given to R1 until August 14th 2024. Based on interview with Health Services Director Marties Meneses she started at the community around August 2023. Health Services Director stated the order was followed but in December 2023, someone on her staff found the original order of Oxybutynin from R1's former physician dated 3/16/2023. Heath Services Director stated that once it was brought to her attention that an order was received on 07/19/2023 by R1's current physician then the MAR was updated. Health Services Director stated the order from 07/19/2023 was filed by previous Health Services Director and was not located until August 2024. Per interview with Health Services Director the issue was not reported to the Department. It was alleged on or around December 2023 R1's neurologist prescribed Sertraline. Per interview with Health Services Director it was confirmed the facility received a prescription for Sertraline on 12/29/2023. Per review of the MAR Sertraline was not given to R1 until 2/10/2024. Health Services Director was unable to provide information as to why the medication was not provided from 12/29/2023 to 02/09/2024 as she stated it was added to medication list by pharmacy. LPA Mendivil's review of MAR from December 2023 to February 2024 do not mention Sertraline or any brand name for Sertraline until 2/10/2024. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through records reviewed and interviews the allegations facility did not provide medications as prescribed and facility did not meet reporting requirements are determined to be SUBSTANTIATED, meaning the complaint allegation is valid and that a violation has occurred. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to the facility representative.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(D)Type B

    (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This requirement was not met as evidence by facility did not report medication issue to the Department. This poses a potential safety risks to persons in care.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: 4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidence by resident was not given prescription medications from 12/29/2023 to 02/09/2024.

  • 87465(e)Type A

    (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication This requirement was not met as evidence by facility provided R1 with medication that was not authorized after being discontinued by current physician. This poses an immediate health and safety risks to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 inspection of IVY AT WELLINGTON, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of IVY AT WELLINGTON, THE on January 9, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to IVY AT WELLINGTON, THE on January 9, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not l..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.