Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Complaint

FAMILY CHOICE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 306006247
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Facility Administrator did not assess the resident at the hospital until 04/06/2024 after multiple conversations with Licensing. Updated physician report dated 04/05/2024 indicates resident is now bedridden and outside licensing regulations as facility does not have a bedridden fire clearance. Administrator provided incident reports dated 03/13/2024 and 03/16/2024 regarding hospitalization of R1. Administrator indicates faxing the reports to the department but does not have a fax receipt. Department regulations require facilities to report incidents to responsible parties, licensing, and physician but the requirement does not apply to outside agencies. Based on interviews conducted and record review, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to facility.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87405(d)(1)Type A

    Knowledge of care and supervision requirements

    The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)... Knowledge of the requirements for providing care and supervision appropriate to the residents. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure facility has a qualified administrator. Administrator allowed R1 to remain at hospital for 18 days without following up with licensing or hospital affecting R1's finances and/ or ALW. This poses an immediate health and safety risk.

  • 87463(a)Type A

    Update reappraisal at required intervals

    The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate... This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was re-assessed for suitability to return to the facility. R1 was re-assessed 18 days after potential discharge. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 10, 2024 inspection of FAMILY CHOICE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of FAMILY CHOICE SENIOR LIVING on April 10, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to FAMILY CHOICE SENIOR LIVING on April 10, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.