Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHESTNUT COVELicense 306006592
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

For this reason, R1 stated they did not negotiate the terms and conditions of the admission agreement and left it to W1 to “sort out.” During their interview, W1 stated it had all been “an innocent mistake” and provided a written statement which read in part: “The issue was due to an error in the paperwork for my husband’s assisted living fees. I hope that my ability to clear up this misunderstanding allows the Department of Social Services to also clear up the issue.” During their interview, LR stated that the original agreed upon basic service fee was $4,500, however, the amount had originally been left blank at the time that the admission agreement was signed. LR stated that once W1 informed them they were being overcharged, a meeting was held with all parties involved and the handwritten statements were added to the first page of the admission agreement, in order to honor W1’s believe that basic service fee was that of $4,000 and allow the proper 60-day notification for rent increase to take place. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging Staff did not provide 60-day notice prior to rent increase. Based upon resident file review, written statements provided, and interviews conducted, We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87507(g)(3)(A)Type B

    (g) Admission agreements shall specify the following: (3) Payment provisions, including... (A) Rate for all basic services which the facility is required to provide in order to obtain and maintain a license.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as basic service fee amount for R1 was originally left blank at the time that the admission agreement was signed.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 4, 2025 inspection of CHESTNUT COVE?

This was a complaint inspection of CHESTNUT COVE on June 4, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHESTNUT COVE on June 4, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.