complaint·November 14, 2025

Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not properly document resident medications: it was alleged that the facility did not document R1’s Morphine and Lorazepam, Resident #2’s (R2) Morphine and Lorazepam, and Resident #3’s (R3) Morphine. LPA inspected the facility, conducted health and safety checks on R1, R2, and R3, and observed no health and safety issues. LPA interviewed AD, who admitted the allegation, stating that these residents were on hospice and had these medications delivered to the facility upon being admitted to hospice but the centrally stored medication records and medication administration records for these residents did not include these medications despite AD’s multiple attempts to get the hospice company and pharmacy to include these medications on these documents. LPA reviewed the centrally stored medication records and medication administration records for R1, R2, and R3 and confirmed that these medications were not included on these documents when the medications were delivered to the facility and in the case of R1 and R2 were not included on these documents for multiple months. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not dispose of expired medications: it was alleged that on October 30, 2025, bottles of expired antacids and anti-gas medications were found in the medication room with expiration dates of August 2025, multiple expired suppositories were found in the medication room refrigerator with expiration dates of July 2025, and AD and the medication technician were notified and stated they would destroy these expired medications and reorder new ones. LPA interviewed AD who admitted the allegation, stating that expired medications were found in the facility’s medication room and that after being made aware of the expired medications, facility staff destroyed them following the facility’s protocol. AD stated they did not believe these medications were given to residents after they expired. Regarding the allegation that facility staff did not ensure resident wound care was properly documented: it was alleged that R1 did not have documentation of the wound care for R1’s stage 1 pressure wound. LPA reviewed R1’s hospice medical records which indicate that on October 24, 2025, R1’s doctor diagnosed R1 with a stage 1 pressure ulcer and gave an order for wound care. LPA interviewed AD who admitted the allegation, stating that the facility was unaware that R1 had a wound or was receiving wound care and the facility did not have documentation for the wound care provided by R1’s hospice company as of October 30, 2025, but that the facility requested and received the wound care records at a later date. AD stated that apart from the wound care R1 received from their hospice care team, R1 received the facility’s standard repositioning care from the facility’s own staff, but that this care was not documented either. LPA reviewed R1’s hospice medical records which shows that R1 received wound care from their hospice care team, but this documentation was not obtained by the facility until weeks after the wound care began and is still incomplete for the time period between October 24, 2025 and November 10, 2025. During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.