Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Review of records and interviews also found that R1 requires stand-by assist for transfers and ADLs. Interviews also found that R1 is not always compliant to ask for and wait for assistance. Some of the reported times where R1 needed to wait for staff assist from the toilet were times where R1 did not notify staff before self ambulating to the toilet so staff longer responses could be attributed to delays due to care for others. Staff are not providing a comfortable environment for resident- Interviews and inspections found R1's room to have the required furniture and fixtures. Additionally, staff provide regular house keeping and pet care for R1's dog. R1's room was observed to be clean and odor- free. Part of what was reported as discomforts were noises such as an adjacent door alarm, other residents' alarms needed for their care or behavioral expressions of others. As R1 resides in a memory care facility in which noises of others or others' equipment, those noises, while unfortunate, do not constitute an uncomfortable environment under Title 22 requirements. Staff are not treating resident with dignity- Observations and interviews did not find sufficient evidence that facility staff have not treated R1 with dignity and respect. Records found that R1 has care needs in the high care level. Additionally, R1 received approximately 14- 20 call response by staff in the Sept call logs reviewed. Interviews found that staff interact with R1 respectfully during those interactions. In interactions with management, R1's, care needs and expectations have been regularly discussed. Staff are retaliating against resident for filing a complaint- LPAs based on interviews did not find evidence that staff have retaliated toward R1. R1 receives the care identified by respectful staff. There has been no disruption to the care of R1 or R1's dog. R1 is not being evicted. Any known disagreements between management, R1 or R1's family , regarding care, costs or expectations, have not impacted R1's care. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview with administrator.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 8, 2025 inspection of SUMMERSET LINCOLN ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of SUMMERSET LINCOLN ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE on December 8, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SUMMERSET LINCOLN ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE on December 8, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.