Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SILVANA SENIOR CARE 4License 3127010262 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

were no fall preventative measures in place during the nighttime. S3 was live-in staff and could not provide any information about the care R1 required during the daytime or nighttime. S3 denied checking on residents during the nighttime. On 1/23/2026, at approximately 1500 hours, staff called 911 for R1 because they were complaining of left hip pain. R1 was admitted to Sutter Roseville Medical Center and diagnosed with a left hip fracture. The hospital contacted facility staff to determine how R1 may have sustained the fractured hip and there were no records of any recent falls. However, there was a text message from S3 to the facility group chat that indicated S3 found R1 on the floor on 1/23/2026 at 0400 hours. S3 placed R1 back in their bed. It was unknown how long R1 was on their bedroom floor prior to S3 finding them. Staff interviews indicated that protocol for unwitnessed falls is to call 911. Based on interviews conducted and documentation obtained, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. As a result of the resident's serious bodily injury, an immediate civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1548 in the amount of $500 is being assessed for a violation that the Department determines resulted in the injury or illness of a person in care. An additional civil penalty assessment is under review and determination is pending. LPA will return on a future date to assess an additional civil penalty if warranted. See 9099-D for citations Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights provided. Based on LPA's interviews, the department has found the complaint allegation to be unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided to the facility.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(g)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health . . . This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 having an unwitnessed fall and staff not calling 911 for transport and evaluation which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    87468.2(a)(4)87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents . . . (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents . .(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: R1 being documented as a fall risk and not providing adequate supervision which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to resident in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports. . .(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days . . .(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, . . .This requirement was not met as evidenced by R1 sustaining a fall and being sent to the hospital and the facility did not submit the required LIC624. This poses an indirect threat to the health and safety of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 22, 2026 inspection of SILVANA SENIOR CARE 4?

This was a complaint inspection of SILVANA SENIOR CARE 4 on April 22, 2026. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SILVANA SENIOR CARE 4 on April 22, 2026?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circum..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.