Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BROOKDALE AUBURNLicense 317005468
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA investigated allegation, “Staff allow the residents to be soiled for an extended periods of time”. LPA interviewed 5 residents in care in which they stated their care needs are being met. LPA interviewed 4 care staff in which they stated they have not observed residents soiled and left in an extended period of time. Care staff stated they have heard about times that has occurred, but they did not observe it. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated she is not aware of residents being left soiled for an extended period of time. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not practice safe food handling techniques”. LPA toured the facility kitchen, refrigerator, freezer, dry storage, and food preparation area. LPA observed 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable amount of food. LPA observed all food to be properly stored and all food appeared to be fresh and within the expiration date limits. Kitchen appeared to clean, sanitary, and free from smell. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated the allegation, “Staff do not properly maintain the facility grounds”. LPA interviewed 5 residents in which they stated the facility, and their room is kept clean at all times. 1 resident stated staff forget to empty their trash within their room on the weekends. LPA interviewed the administrator, in which she stated there is a housekeeper at the facility 7 days a week. Common spaces get cleaned daily, resident rooms get cleaned weekly, and sections of the facility get deep cleaned throughout the week. LPA interviewed 1 housekeeper in which she stated they clean the facility 7 days a week. LPA toured the facility and inspected common living spaces, resident rooms assisted living and memory care units, kitchen, and memory care unit. LPA observed the facility to be clean and sanitary with no smell present. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds the allegations to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff do not provide hygiene products.” LPA interviewed 1 housekeeper in which they stated the facility provides the residents with basic hygiene items like toilet paper. LPA interviewed 5 resident in which they stated the facility provides them with basic hygiene products if needed. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated there is a storage room full of basic hygiene items for residents if needed. LPA toured the storage room on the 2 nd and 3 rd floor which had toilet paper, soap, caregiver supplies, continence supplies, and other hygiene items. Due to the information gathered, LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff are chemically restraining the residents while in care.” LPA reviewed 4 resident medications, reviewing the present medications with resident MARS and physician orders. LPA interviewed 4 residents which required medication management from the facility staff. 4 of 4 residents stated they receive their medication daily and have had no problems with the medication management. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated the medication technicians follow physician orders and give medications as prescribed. LPA interviewed 1 medication technician in which they stated if a hospice resident has a PRN medication order they call hospice before giving a PRN medication. Medication technician stated they follow medication orders which are on the resident MARS. Due to the information gathered LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED. LPA investigated, " Staff are mishandling the residents medications". LPA reviewed 4 resident medications, reviewing the present medications with resident MARS and physician orders. LPA interviewed 4 residents which required medication management from the facility staff. 4 of 4 residents stated they receive their medication daily and have had no problems with the medication management. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated the medication technicians follow physician orders and give medications as prescribed. LPA interviewed 1 medication technician in which they stated they follow medication orders which are on the resident MARS. Due to the information gathered LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation 9099-C. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff are yelling at the residents while in care.” LPA interviewed 5 residents in which they stated they have not been yelled at or observed any other resident being yelled at by facility staff. LPA interviewed 4 care staff in which they stated they have not observed any staff yelling at residents in care. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated she has not observed any staff yelling at a resident in care. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87469(c)(3)Type A

    87469 Advanced Directives and Requests Regarding Resuscitative Measures(c) If a resident who has an advance directive and/or request regarding resuscitative measures form on file experiences a medical emergency, facility staff shall do one of the following: (3) Specifically for a terminally ill resident that is receiving hospice services and has completed an advance directive and/or request regarding resuscitative measures form pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 1569.73(c), and is experiencing a life-threatening emergency as displayed by symptoms of impending death that is directly related to the expected course of the resident’s terminal illness, the facility may immediately notify the resident’s hospice agency in lieu of calling emergency response (9-1-1). For emergencies not directly related to the expected course of the resident’s terminal illness, the facility staff shall immediately telephone emergency response (9-1-1). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the licensee did not call emergency services for R1 upon fall at the facility which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 11, 2023 inspection of BROOKDALE AUBURN?

This was a complaint inspection of BROOKDALE AUBURN on October 11, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BROOKDALE AUBURN on October 11, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.