Follow-up on corrections·August 4, 2023

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted a visit to the facility for an unrelated matter and found deficiencies in the process. This report is to document those deficiencies. LPA met with staff, Dominga Altoba who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was found through interview with Licensee that Resident #1 (R1) had been diagnosed with an infectious disease under the Title 22 Prohibited Conditions. R1's responsible party was contacted who stated they were informed by licensee that they could not return to the facility. Licensee confirmed this and stated they had provided a list of placement's for R1 and had gone on to accept another resident in R1's place. Licensee stated they had not issued the family with an eviction notice as the family had agreed to move R1. Licensee also stated they could get Resident #2 (R2) to move within a couple days from the facility as they seemed to be a "reasonable" person. Licensee was unaware of the fact that they needed an eviction notice. During today's visit PA was informed by staff that R3 had been discharged after living at the facility for (2) days. LPA also observed R1 was still not back at the facility. Therefore, based on the above the facility failed to provide R1 and R3 with an eviction notice when warranted. Deficiency was cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 on an LIC809-D. Plan of correction was unable to be made with licensee over the phone as licensee acted in unprofessional manner. Licensee will be contacted for an office meeting. An exit interview was conducted with Staff Dominga Altoba where this report along with LIC809-D page and appeal rights were reviewed and provided to them. Staff refused to sign the report.