Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

PACIFIC VISTA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 331880572
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Per an interview with SNF staff revealed that R1 was discharged, with a prescription, that was sent to a local pharmacy. In addition, per SNF staff when medication is sent to the pharmacy, the medication will be delivered the same day if not the next day. Per an interview with the local pharmacy staff revealed that R1 did have a profile with them but no medication. LPA inquired as to why there would be a profile, but no medications. The pharmacy staff explained that “it could mean the medications were cancelled, transferred, or were never sent to the pharmacy”. During the initial complaint visit conducted on 8/8/23, LPA did not observe a facility file nor documents, to confirm which medications R1 was prescribed. However, it was confirmed that R1 was discharged from the SNF to the facility and the medication was sent over to the pharmacy. There was no other explanation provided from the Administrator Jamie, other than “no R1 was not given any medication at the facility as they were not a resident. A list of medications was not provided for LPA to review from the Pharmacy, due insufficient evidence the allegation of staff failed to administer residents medication as prescribed is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report, and appeal rights were reviewed and provided to Jamie Teng, Administrator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87456(a)(1Type B

    87456 Evaluation of Suitability for Admission (a)(1-3) Prior to accepting a resident for care and in order to evaluate his/her suitability, the facility shall, as specified in this article 8: (1) Conduct an interview with the applicant and his responsible person. (2) Perform a pre- admission appraisal. (3) Obtain and evaluate a recent medical assessment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The licensee failed to conduct an evaluation for R1, 1 time. This posed a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 5, 2023 inspection of PACIFIC VISTA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PACIFIC VISTA SENIOR LIVING on October 5, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PACIFIC VISTA SENIOR LIVING on October 5, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.