Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with staff Marineth Reyes and Henry Reyes who provide LPA with resident files (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6). Review of resident records does not reveal any resident with a prohibited health condition. LPA met and observed all residents at time of visit. LPA observed the food supply and observed a sufficient supplies of perishables and non perishables with food being served of good quality and ample servings. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that the facility is over capacity, facility is serving food not of good quality and the facility does not maintain sufficient food and supplies for residents and facility retaining resident's with prohibited health conditions. Therefore, the allegations that is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Report specified resident events within seven days

    Reporting requirementsEach licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence This was not met as evidenced by; LPA observed resident #1 with an injury. CCL records reviewed to show that no incident report as been submitted of this injury or any other occurrence at the facility since June 2022

  • 87405Type A

    Administrator - Qualifications and DutiesAll facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management This was not met as evidenced by: LPA arriving to the facility with no qualified administrator for approximately 30 days.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 28, 2023 inspection of EMK RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR ELDERLY?

This was a complaint inspection of EMK RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR ELDERLY on February 28, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to EMK RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR ELDERLY on February 28, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.