Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

SPRING MEADOWS ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 3318808464 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator - Cynthia Garcia and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (5). LPA was accompanied by Licensee/Administrator Cynthia Garcia to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated space for resident/staff files. During facility tour, LPA Rico observed video cameras inside resident rooms. The Administrator stated the facility had received consent from the family. During record review, LPA Rico observed the facility did not have a written consent and cameras have not been approved as part of their Plan of Operation/ Admission Agreement. LPA Rico also obsevred R2 will full bed rails without a physician order. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. . Record Review: LPA reviewed (6) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (6) resident medications and (2) hospice files. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. During medication audit, LPA observed R1 PRN were dispensed daily but not documented with the date/time along with the reason and result. Lastly, LPA observed (2) staff did not have their health screening. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809, LIC809D)was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Cynthia Garcia. Along with Appeal Rights.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87209(a)(2)Type A

    Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having video cameras inside resident bedrooms which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(f)Type B

    Based on record review and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, two staff withouth a Health Screening which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(c)(3)Type A

    Based on record review , the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in R1 PRN were dispensed daily, not documented which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87608(a)(5)(B)Type A

    Based on observations and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by R2 having full bedrails which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 13, 2026 inspection of SPRING MEADOWS ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a inspection inspection of SPRING MEADOWS ASSISTED LIVING on February 13, 2026. 4 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SPRING MEADOWS ASSISTED LIVING on February 13, 2026?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (3 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having video cameras..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a inspection inspection. inspection inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.