Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MIDTOWN VILLALicense 3318810041 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continuation from LIC9099) Based on records review and interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. California Code of Regulations Title 22 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report along with the LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were reviewed and provided to Administrator, Kathleen Hyland. (Continuation from LIC9099) LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer resides at the facility, and attempts to contact R1 were unsuccessful. A random sample of residents were interviewed, where 4 of 4 residents reported not having any concerns at the facility. It was further alleged staff did not provide activities to R1. Records review of the facility’s monthly activity log was completed. The activity log divulged two activities a day are provided for the residents in care. Through staff interviews, it was reported R1 refused to participate in planned activities and preferred to stay in their room. LPA attempted to interview R1, however R1 no longer resides at the facility, and attempts to contact R1 were unsuccessful. A random sample of residents were conducted, where 3 of 4 residents reported participating in activities. The remaining interview revealed 1 of 4 reported they no longer wanted to participate in the interview; therefore, the question regarding activities was not answered. Based on records review and interviews, the allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened and/or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was reviewed and provided to Administer, Kathleen Hyland.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature… This requirement was not met as evidence by: based on records review, (1) one out of (1) one resident was not free of punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, and/or other actions of a punitive nature by staff taking away resident personal items.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 4, 2025 inspection of MIDTOWN VILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of MIDTOWN VILLA on September 4, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MIDTOWN VILLA on September 4, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.