Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

COTTON VILLA RCFELicense 331881373
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation “Staff neglected the resident in care.” It is alleged staff neglected R1. Three (3) out of the three (3) residents interviewed by LPA Ramirez denied this allegation. Resident interviews revealed residents in care do not feel neglected by staff. Four (4) out of the four (4) staff interviewed denied this allegation. R1 is no longer at the facility and was not interviewed during LPA’s visit. During record review, LPA did not observe incident reports which indicated R1 was neglected while in care. During facility tour, LPA Ramirez toured three (3) occupied resident rooms and did not observe any deficiencies. LPA Ramirez observed residents in care to be well groomed and alert. On 12/20/2023, hospice staff interview conducted by LPA Mixon revealed that in December of 2023, facility staff did notify hospice staff about R1’s leaky ileostomy bag and hospice staff arrived to change R1’s bag and leave additional supplies. This interview also revealed that hospice staff trained facility staff on how to change R1’s ileostomy bag and hospice staff observed facility staff properly complete this task. On 12/20/2023, resident interview conducted by LPA Mixon did not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . “Staff got angry with resident in care.” It is alleged S5 got angry with R1. Three (3) out of the three (3) residents interviewed by LPA Ramirez denied this allegation. Residents interviewed corroborated they felt “safe” at the facility and felt “respected” by staff. Four (4) out of the four (4) staff interviewed denied this allegation. R1 is no longer at the facility and was not interviewed during LPA’s visit. Interview with Administrator Mesropyan revealed R5 no longer works at the facility and resigned in December of 2024 to move back to their country. LPA attempted to contact R5 via telephone, but all attempts were unsuccessful. On 12/20/2023, resident interview conducted by LPA Mixon did not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 23, 2026 inspection of COTTON VILLA RCFE?

This was a complaint inspection of COTTON VILLA RCFE on March 23, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COTTON VILLA RCFE on March 23, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.