Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SAVANT OF JURUPA VALLEYLicense 335530032
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

In regards to the allegation that resident is not receiving medications as prescribed: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Renese Howell-Small interviewed (5) staff and ten (10) residents. Staff stated that medical technicians are trained through Relias, monthly in-services, pharmacist and hospice agencies. Staff denied not administering medications as prescribed by a physician. LPA audited the Medication Administration Record(s) (MAR) for Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2 (R2) and Resident 3 (R3). LPA did not observe any errors when the MAR was reviewed. The MAR and the facility's resident notes in the August program, indicate that R1 had a record of refusing medications and although R1 was unable to administer their own medications, kept medications in their room. All ten (10) of the residents stated that they received their medications. Staff also stated that residents may become upset when the physician adjusts their medication and the new medication has changed in appearance. Based on interview and record review, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In regards to the allegation that call button not in working order for months: LPA interviewed ten (10) residents. All ten (10) of the residents stated that they have a call button and it is in working condition. LPA observed ten (10) residents interviewed to have a call button and tested random call buttons during the visit in which staff arrived to assist. LPA interviewed five (5) staff and staff stated that each resident is given a call button when hey become residents of the facility. Residents will communicate with staff if their call button is not working. Staff will test the call button and replace the battery when needed. Staff denied that call buttons have not been in working order for months. R1 received a call button but refused it, stating to staff that it was broken. Facility notes confirm that when R1 left the facility on 03/21/2025, R1 turned in their keys/pendant. Based on interviews and record review, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. UNSUBSTANTIATED is defined as the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 and LIC9099C was discussed and a copy was provided to staff.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 24, 2025 inspection of SAVANT OF JURUPA VALLEY?

This was a complaint inspection of SAVANT OF JURUPA VALLEY on July 24, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SAVANT OF JURUPA VALLEY on July 24, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.