Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

JMP CARE HOMELicense 3364021662 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

resident records, there was no indication following these falls, that facility implemented a plan of care to minimize R1’s risk for future falls. According to R1 facility records dated June 2020, R1 was “subject to fall” and required a walker for ambulation due to diagnosis of Paraparesis of both limbs. It was noted that facility staff will monitor. In addition, Staff #2 (S2) reported during the investigation that R1 had been showing decline in functioning and started walking slower; however, S2 reported that R1 refused to use walker. In addition, S2 told Department staff that S2 did not consult a doctor about R1 refusal for assistive devices. Despite staff observing change in R1’s condition, there was no indication again that facility implemented a plan of care to minimize R1’s risk for future falls. Furthermore, in September 17, 2020, due to what was identified as another fall, R1 was transported to the hospital and subsequently diagnosed with fracture of the cervical vertebrae. The allegation that, facility staff neglected R1, is substantiated. In regard to allegation #2, On 9/17/2020 at around 4:00 am, Staff #1 (S1) reported that they heard R1 get up to go to the bathroom. Then, R1 went back to R1 room but left the door open. S1 stated that this was very unusual for R1, so S1 decided to check on R1. When S1 entered the room, R1 was sitting on the floor with back leaning against the wall. S1 picked R1 up and put R1 back in bed. S1 reported no visible bruising or swelling to R1. However, S1 did not indicate if R1 was awake at the time of this incident nor was it indicated that S1 inquired with R1 as to R1’s condition immediately following the incident. S1 admitted to not reporting R1’s fall immediately to the facility administrator nor seeking medical attention or 9-1-1. S1 stated that at 11:00 am, R1 asked for assistance getting out of a chair and getting into bed. S1 stated that this was unusual for R1. S1 stated that R1 also complained of neck pain, which is when S1 decided to contact S2. It was reported that S2 arrived around 11:15 am. S1 had not called 9-1-1 prior to S2’s arrival even though S1 exhibited “unusual” behavior. S2 stated she found a “bump” on R1’s head and then called R1’s responsible party and 9-1-1. However, according to R1’s medical records, R1 was admitted into the hospital due to the fall, around 1:02 PM, approximately 9 hours after R1 initially fell. The allegation that, facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention for R1, is substantiated. Based upon the evidence discovered in the investigation, including interviews and records review, allegation that facility staff failed to seek timely medical attention for R1 is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. This posed an immediate Health and Safety risk to residents in care. See deficiencies cited on LIC 9099D. In addition, an immediate civil penalty will be assessed for violation resulting in injury. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(g)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circumstance has resulted in an imminent threat to a resident’s health including, but not limited to, an apparent life-threatening medical crisis except as specified in Sections 87469(c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4). This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not ensure that R1 received timely medical attention. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(8)Type A

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of ... (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (8) To be free from neglect, .... This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interview, the licensee did not ensure that R1's personal right to be free of neglect. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87211(a)(D)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, ...this requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure that reports regarding R1's fall, which resulted in serious injuries, were sent to the Department appropriately. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87466Type B

    87466 Observation of the Resident -The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social ... When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical . This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure that R1 was regularly observed for changes in physical condition. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87705(5)(A)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia Licensees... ensuring the following: (5) shall include a reassessment of the resident’s dementia care... (A).. dementia care needs have changed, corresponding changes shall be made in the care and supervision provided to that resident. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure that corresponding changes were made to the care and supervision of R1. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 14, 2022 inspection of JMP CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of JMP CARE HOME on April 14, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to JMP CARE HOME on April 14, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (g) The licensee shall immediately telephone 9-1-1 if an injury or other circum..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.