Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 336403366
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

that the facility staff were in constant communication with their health providers and also sent R1 to the emergency room once pressure injuries worsened. LPA Williams reviewed documentation from the facility in which it appeared that a home health agency was caring for R1's pressure injuries. In addition, the documentation appeared to show that facility was in constant communication with R1's health care providers and sought a higher level of care for R1's pressure injuries when needed. In regards to allegation #2, LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and Staff # (S3) who denied that residents are left in soiled diapers for extended periods of time. S1, S2, and S3 stated that the facility staff check/change incontinent residents every two hours or as needed. LPA Williams interviewed R1, who stated that they do not recall an incidence where they were left in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. LPA Williams also interviewed Resident #2 (R2) who denied that any incidence where they were left in a soiled diaper for an extended period of time. R2 stated that facility staff are meeting their incontinence needs appropriately. In regards to allegation #3, LPA Williams interviewed S1, S2, and S3, who all stated that resident care needs are being met appropriately. S1 stated that there is sufficient staffing to care for residents and appropriate training provided to facility staff regarding resident care. LPA Williams interviewed R1 and R2 who both stated that their care needs are being met while residing at the facility. R1 stated that they have "no complaints with the facility." R2 stated that facility staff "are doing a great job." Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, LPA Williams has determined that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the investigation.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 24, 2022 inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on January 24, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on January 24, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.