Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 336403366
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Continuation from 9099) In regards to the allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents suffering a fall and sustaining injuries, information obtained stated facility staff did not provide adequate supervision for the residents. It was also reported that the facility did not seek medical attention. Information obtained from interviews stated that residents are able to request assistance from facility staff when needed and obtain assistance within a reasonable time period. Through interviews obtained, the residents stated that they are able to get and receive medical attention if needed and no issues or concerns were advised. It was also reported that staff left resident soiled for a long period of time and staff did not replace resident’s bedding. It was reported that an additional witness observed Resident #1 (R1) to be covered in feces while they were sleeping on separate occasions. It was reported that Resident’s bedding had vomit stains. It was also reported that staff did not dispose of residents’ trash. LPA observed resident’s bedding, trash, and room and deemed that it met the regulatory requirements. Through record reviews and staff interviews, LPA learned that there is a schedule where the staff changed bedding and takes out the trash. Residents can request to have it done more frequently, as needed. Interviews with residents corroborated the information obtained from staff. Information obtained from residents stated they can get assistance with changing briefs and bedding, in a reasonable. No issues or concerns were advised. (Continued on 9099-C) (Continuation from 9099) In regards to staff refusing to assist a resident in care, it was reported that staff refused to help residents get around the facility. During the LPA visit on 08/08/2023, residents indicated that they are able to ask for assistance and receive it. Based on LPA’s observation, interview conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence shows that the allegations of staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident suffering a fall and sustaining injuries, facility did not seek medical attention for a resident in care, staff left resident soiled for a long period of time, staff did not replace resident's bedding, staff did not dispose of resident's trash, staff refused to assist a resident in care may have occurred, however is not supported or proven by evidence. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, appeal rights was provided to the Administrator, Aurelien Fruit as evidenced by his signature.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 4, 2023 inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on October 4, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on October 4, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.