Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 3364033661 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

In regard to the allegation “Resident's motorized wheelchair broke due to staff neglect”, It is alleged that S1 broke R1’s motorized wheelchair by turning it off and on. During interviews with Administrator, it was revealed that the wheelchair had never actually been broken and that the battery had just died. Three (3) out of three (3) staff all stated they have never witnessed staff break residents belongs. During interviews with residents’ thirteen (13) out of thirteen (13) stated that staff has never broken any of their belongs. R1 stated that S1 liked to turn their wheelchair off and on preventing it from working when the battery would die. Based on interviews conducted, and information that was gathered, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation(s). Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A copy of this report was given to the Administrator. In regard to the allegation “Resident was abandoned due to staff neglect”, It is alleged that S1 left R1 in an inoperable motorized wheelchair unable to call for assistance. During interviews with Administrator, it was revealed that S1 left R1 knowingly in wheelchair not working unable to reach for call button or phone to ask for assistance. It was also revealed that S1 admitted to Administrator to leaving R1 alone because of the behavior issues R1 displays. During interviews with residents twelve (12) out of thirteen (13) stated they have never been neglected by staff. R1 stated that S1 knew the chair was not working and did not assist them to bed leaving him/her sitting waiting for another caregiver to find them. Based on record review and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This deficiency is evidenced by the following:R1 was left in a non-working motorized wheelchair in room unable to call for assistance by S1.This poses a health and safety risk to clients in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)(3)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.(3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. This deficiency is evidenced by the following:R1 and R2 were video recorded by S1 having intercourse without their knowledge or consent.This poses a health and safety risk to clients in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 29, 2025 inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on June 29, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on June 29, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.