Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 336403366
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA conducted interviews with three (3) staff members, all of whom denied confining any residents. All three (3) staff members interviewed stated that none of the residents expressed any concerns or complaints regarding isolation during COVID outbreak. LPA’s records review revealed that staff followed the procedures according to their plan of operation. Based on the interviews conducted and records review, the Department’s investigation did not provide enough information to corroborate the allegation that staff confine residents to bedroom. This allegation is unsubstantiated. It was alleged that staff do not ensure that residents’ dietary needs are being met. Information received indicated that those residents who were in isolation missed their meals. LPA conducted interviews with ten (10) residents, all of whom denied missing any meals. Six (6) of the ten (10) residents interviewed were tested positive for COVID, and staff delivered three (3) meals to their rooms during the isolation periods. LPA conducted interviews with three (3) staff members, all of whom stated that all meals were delivered to the residents’ rooms during their isolation periods. None of the three (3) staff members interviewed heard any complaints about missed meals from residents. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the Department’s investigation did not provide enough information to corroborate the allegation that staff do not ensure that residents’ dietary needs are being met. This allegation is unsubstantiated. It was alleged that staff do not communicate with residents regarding care. Information received indicated that some residents who were in isolation for five (5) days were asked to be isolated again for another five (5) days without any explanation. LPA conducted interviews with six (6) residents who were tested positive for COVID. One (1) resident tested positive stated that they were in isolation for 10 days. Five (5) residents tested positive stated that they were in isolation for five (5) days only. LPA conducted interviews with three (3) staff members, all of whom stated that staff followed the facility’s plan of operation regarding COVID outbreak. Residents who were tested negative on day six (6) were given OK stop isolation. Residents who were tested positive on day six (6) were asked to continue isolation for another five (5) days. LPA’s records review confirmed the statements from the staff members interviewed. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the Department’s investigation did not provide enough information to corroborate the allegation that staff do not communicate with residents regarding care. This allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87312Type B

    Motor Vehicles Used in Transporting Residents: Only drivers licensed for the type of vehicles,,, Any vehicle used by the facility to transport residents shall be maintained in a safe operating condition.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records review, the facility transportation vehicle did not have working air conditioner for over 30 days. This posed potential personal rights and health and safety risks to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 29, 2026 inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on May 29, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to PALM COURT ASSISTED LIVING on May 29, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.