Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CORONA RCFELicense 3364238801 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Rico had obtained facility footage, that demonstrated R1 had left the facility on 2/12/2025 at 10:25am and returned on 2/12/2025 at 11:45am. LPA Rico observed facility had refused to accept resident back to the facility, as resident attempted to gain entry. During facility tour, LPA Rico observed R1 personal belongings had remained inside the facility. In addition, the facility did not provide a 30 day eviction notice to Community Care Licensing and resident did not provide a 30 day notice of move out. Furthermore, the self-voluntary document is not part of Facility Program Designed and is not approved by Community Care Licensing. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to Administrator Jennifer D. Montgomery, along with a copy of the appeal rights. Administrator Jennifer D. Monthgomery refused to signed document.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(20)Type A

    To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions.. state.. and relocation protections for residents. For purposes of this paragraph.. means a transfer, discharge, or eviction that is initiated by the licensee, not by the resident. This requirement wasn't met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, facility tour and video footage the Administrator refused to accept resident back to the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 8, 2025 inspection of CORONA RCFE?

This was a complaint inspection of CORONA RCFE on April 8, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CORONA RCFE on April 8, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions.. state.. and relocation protections for residents..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.