Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CORONA RCFELicense 3364238801 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Jennifer Montgomery. The Administrator agreed to signed the UNSUBSTANTIATED LIC9099. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because of the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to Administrator Jennifer D. Montgomery, along with a copy of the appeal rights. Administrator Jennifer D. Montgomery refused to sign the SUBSTANTIATED LIC9099.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(11)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(11)To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advocacy representatives, permitted to visit privately ....and without prior notice, provided that the rights of other residents are not infringed upon. This requirement wasn't met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, which staff denied R1's Physician to enter the facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 25, 2026 inspection of CORONA RCFE?

This was a complaint inspection of CORONA RCFE on March 25, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CORONA RCFE on March 25, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(11)To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advoca..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.