Complaint·May 1, 2024

LPA Prieto interviewed S2, who was present at the time of the altercation. S2 stated that there was proper supervision in accordance with regulations and that the appropriate follow-up steps were taken after the incident. LPA Prieto also interviewed S3, who works with R1, and confirmed that staffing was adequate per regulations and that there had been no previous instances of aggression from R1 or R2. Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in a fall, LPA Prieto interviewed S1, S2, and S3, all of whom were present at the time of the altercation. Administrator Tawfik provided the names of S4 and S5, who were working in the cottages where the altercation occurred and met the required supervision standards according to regulations. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations that staff failed to prevent a resident from harming another resident and that staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a fall. Therefore, these allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report was signed by LPA Prieto and Executive Director Tawfik, and a copy was left with the facility.