Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

COUNTRY CLUB MANORLicense 3427003012 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents and it was learned that 6 out of 10 residents had no concerns with the facility trash bin lids are not tightly secured. Furthermore, 6 out of 10 residents have not witnessed other residents digging through the facility garbage. During complaint investigation visit on 09/07/2023 and 10/09/2023 LPA Lee did observe one garbage in the sun room, one garbage in the activity room, one garbage in the front entry of the facility, one garbage in the dining room and three big garbage in the hallway. All the garbage’s observed on both days throughout the facility had fitted tight lids on them. Furthermore, LPA Lee did not observe any residents digging through the facility trash bins. Based on information provided through interviews, observations and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation staff did not ensure that facility trash bin lids are tightly secured. Allegation: Staff financially abused residents in care. It was alleged that staff financially abused residents in care. This investigation consisted of records review and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents and it was learned 10 out of 10 residents have no concern and have not experienced or witness staff financially abused resident in care. Throughout the investigation it was learned that the resident will pay rent by writing a check and then giving the check to the front desk. The front desk then gives the resident a receipt and makes a copy of the resident check and file for record. The front desk then drops the checks into the office locked box. Regional Director Robert Godfrey then picks up the check from the locked box in the office. Furthermore, 5 out of 5 facility staff denies staff are financially abusing residents in care. Based on information provided through interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation staff financially abused resident in care. Allegation: Unqualified staff are administering medications to residents. It was alleged that unqualified staff are administering medications to residents. This investigation consisted of records review and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents and it was learned 6 out of 10 residents are receiving their prescribed medications and have no concerns. LPA Lee also reviewed 3 facility Med-Tech facility files and training records. It was learned that 3 out of 3 Med-Techs files are complete and has the required training documented in their files. Continued LIC 9099-C Based on information provided through interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation staff is not ensuring that resident is dressed in clean clothing. Allegation: Staff is not ensuring that resident is dressed in clean clothing It was alleged that the staff is not ensuring that residents are dressed in clean clothing. This investigation consisted of observations and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents and it was learned that 10 out of 10 residents had no concerns with the staff not ensuring that resident is dressed in clean clothing. Ten residents that were interviewed were observed to be in clean clothing. Furthermore, during the complaint investigation visit on 09/07/2023, 10/09/2023 and 10/31/2023 LPA Lee did not observe any resident in dirty or unclean clothing. Based on information provided through interviews and records reviewed, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation staff is not ensuring that resident is dressed in clean clothing. An exit interview was conducted with Editha Mccullough and Sara Nichols and a copy of this report was given to Editha Mccullough and Sara Nichols. Per facility, LIC 500 Personnel Report it shows that administrator, Rico Foz is at the facility from Monday to Friday from 9:00 AM to 5:30 PM. On 09/07/2023 LPA Lee was at the facility from 9:44 AM to 3:40 PM and did not see administrator at the facility; therefore, the facility is not adhering to facility LIC 500 Personnel Report. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the standard has been met Allegation: Staff did not ensure that residents were eating meals. It was alleged that the staff did not ensure that residents were eating meals. This investigation consisted of recorded reviews and observations and interviews with staff and residents. LPA Lee interviewed 10 out of 10 residents and it was learned that 5 out of 10 residents did not receive their meals delivered to their room when residents don’t come to the dining room. Throughout the investigation, it was learned that residents go to the dining room for all meals. It was also learned that residents can choose to pick up their meals and eat in their room or if resident choose to have meal deliver to their room with no fees. LPA Lee reviewed meal logs and record review revealed that on 09/06/2023 meal logs, 6 breakfast was left black, 3 lunch was left blank and 1 dinner was also left blank. On 09/07/2023, meal logs 5 breakfast was left blank and 2 lunch was left blank. On 10/27/2023 meal logs, 1 breakfast was left blank, 1 lunch was left blank and 66 dinner was left blank. Moreover, on 10/30/2023, meal logs 7 breakfast was left blank, 5 lunch was left blank and 68 dinner was also left blank; therefore, it is unclear if the residents received their meals. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Editha Mccullough and Sara Nichols and a copy of this LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D page and appeal rights provided to facility.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87405(a)Type B

    Certified administrator requirements and substitute coverage

    87405(a) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties(a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. The licensee and the administrator may be one and the same person. The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours…This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, records review and observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The administrator did not ensure that administrator is at the facility for sufficient number of hours, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights to person in care.

  • 87555(b)(1Type B

    87555(b)(1) General Food Service Requirements(b) The following food service requirements shall apply:(1) Where all food is provided by the facility arrangements shall be made so that each resident has available at least three meals per day. Exceptions may be allowed on weekends and holidays providing the total daily food needs are met. Not more than fifteen (15) hours shall elapse between the third and first meal.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review the administrator did not comply with the section cited above. The licensee did not ensure that resident is provided with three meals per day. Meal logs reviewed reveals discrepancies; therefore, it is unclear if residents received their meals.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 31, 2023 inspection of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR?

This was a complaint inspection of COUNTRY CLUB MANOR on October 31, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to COUNTRY CLUB MANOR on October 31, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87405(a) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties(a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified admi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.