Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

COGIR OF STOCK RANCHLicense 342700471
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff are not meeting residents showering needs LPA conducted interviews with four (4) staff and eight (8) residents. Resident interviews revealed that some resident’s showers do get missed while other residents stated that their showers do not get missed. One resident stated that sometimes their shower will get missed but if that happens, they will just take a shower by themself. One resident was offered to be switched to evenings to prevent missed morning showers. Interviews with caregivers revealed that three (3) caregivers work per shift. They are referred to as clusters. Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 are responsible for the overall needs of residents throughout that shift. Cluster 3 is responsible for showers and laundry for a handful of residents. Interviews further revealed that when someone calls out for their shift, especially the person who is cluster 3, it can be hard to make sure residents get the showers since caregivers now have to figure out who is going to assist with showers. Showers are set to be 30 minutes for each resident. Staff stated that occasionally showers take longer depending on the extent and then having to assist the resident in getting dressed. When this happens, it can set the caregiver back on showers. If AM shift misses a shower, they ask PM if they can fit it in. If not, they will ask residents if they can shower the next day. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Allegation: Staff are not meeting residents needs Staff interviews indicated that they are not neglecting residents, but it can take them a while to respond to a page.  Additionally, staff stated that sometimes the pagers do not work, or they are off on their timing. Staff stated that many residents will not push their call button because they know it can take a while. Resident interviews revealed that they feel like all their other needs are being met. One resident stated they understand that there are more residents than staff and that they just try to be mindful that staff may be with another resident. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report and appeal rights were left at the facility.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type B

    87465Incidental Medical and Dental Care.(a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility.The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following:(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on observation and interview medications were not being documented accurately.This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(h)(5)Type B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h)The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (5)Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container.  No medications shall be transferred between containers.  . This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on observation and interview, medications are being pre-poured more than 24 hours in advance. LPA interviews indicated that medication is pre-poured for four (4) days in advance. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 24, 2024 inspection of COGIR OF STOCK RANCH?

This was a complaint inspection of COGIR OF STOCK RANCH on July 24, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COGIR OF STOCK RANCH on July 24, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.