Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

COGIR OF STOCK RANCHLicense 3427004711 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Questionable death- Unsubstantiated A review of R1’s death certificate listed that they passed away in May 2025 due to a Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage due to a ground level fall with a time interval between onset and death listed as months. On 02/13/2025, R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall and was sent to the hospital. Medical records show a “possible small left frontal Intracerebral Hemorrhage.” No fractures or other injuries were documented in the medical records. R1 was placed on hospice following this incident. Conflicting statements were provided on whether R1 sustained additional minor falls after 02/13/2025 and while being on hospice. Deputy Coroner (DC) stated that the multiple falls made the brain bleed “a little worse each time.” DC stated this is “common in older people though, especially with R1 being 100 years old.” DC was not concerned that R1 may have passed away due to neglect by the facility staff. DC stated there is “no way” of knowing which fall contributed to R1’s death. It is unclear if the major fall on 02/13/2025 was as a result of staff neglect. Prior to that, R1 had only sustained one fall at the facility on 05/20/2024 and did not require any specialized fall interventions or special checks. Allegation: Resident sustained multiple falls resulting in serious bodily injury- Unsubstantiated Records revealed that R1 resided at the facility for approximately two years and sustained two major falls during that time. The first fall occurred on 05/20/2024 and resulted in a skin tear. The second fall occurred on 02/13/2025 and resulted in a “possible small left frontal Intracerebral Hemorrhage.” No fractures or other injuries were documented in the medical records. Records and interviews support that R1 was not a fall risk and was primarily independent. R1 did not require specialized checks or specific fall measures. Conflicting statements were provided on whether R1 sustained additional minor falls while residing at the facility indicating need for specialized fall prevention interventions. R1 sustained an additional fall on 04/04/2025 while on hospice. Hospice care staff were notified and directed the facility staff to not send R1 to the hospital due to no injuries seen. Based on this information, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights left at the facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87221(a)(1)(B)Type B

    (a)Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. (B) Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in incident reports were missing or not created regarding R1’s fall which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 8, 2025 inspection of COGIR OF STOCK RANCH?

This was a complaint inspection of COGIR OF STOCK RANCH on October 8, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to COGIR OF STOCK RANCH on October 8, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a)Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not li..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.