Complaint·December 4, 2025

S1-S3 stated no staff sleep in the common areas nor have any staff been "live-in staff". S1-S3 stated they decided to have S4 go on a temporary leave due to awaiting their background clearance being resolved via Guardian. S2 stated they spoke with Guardian Operator 91, Jennifer, whom told them it will take a couple of days to update S4's status. LPA interviewed R2 and R3 whom stated they have not seen staff sleep in common areas such as the living room. Based on the interview statements and record review obtained during the investigation process, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the allegation that staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility occurred and is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff: It was alleged that Staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff, the investigation into the above allegation consisted of interviews and record reviews. S1-S3 stated they work variable schedules Monday thru Sunday between 8:00 AM-7:00 PM. S2 stated S4 has not worked at the facility since 12/1/25 but they have not slept at the facility and their hours worked accurately reflects documentation of staff hours worked (LIC 500). Based on the interview statements and record review obtained during the investigation process, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation that staff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff occurred and is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations that staff allowed staff to sleep in common areas of the facility is unsubstantiated and s taff did not ensure staff coverage documentation accurately reflects the actual hours worked by staff, are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies noted or cited per California Code Regulation, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with the facility administrator and a copy of this report was left at the facility.