Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

NORTHERNCARE FACILITYLicense 342700805
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Relevant party reported to the Department that facility staff did not provide resident with requested documents, facility does not meet the residents' dietary needs, and staff threatened a resident with an eviction. During the investigation, LPA interviewed Administrator, staff member S1, and residents R1, R2, R3, and R4. Interview with Administrator indicated that there was a recent request for staff records from a resident that could not be released to the resident. Administrator stated that they provided resident records per request of the resident in a timely manner. No other interviews conducted indicated any issues with obtaining records. LPA observed three (3) resident records indicating that a resident had dietary restrictions. Interviews conducted indicated that facility is following residents' dietary restrictions. During investigation, LPA observed a two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day nonperishable food supply at the facility. LPA observed food to be of good quality. No interviews conducted indicated any concerns regarding facility not meeting residents' dietary needs. Administrator stated that one (1) resident had a contract with the facility for one (1) month, in which resident was to move out of the facility after one (1) month. Resident was sent to the hospital, which placed resident in a skilled nursing facility. No other interviews conducted indicated that anyone witnessed or experienced staff threaten them or another resident with an eviction. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.625(b)(1)Type B

    §1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings; contents (b) (1) The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly who assist residents with personal activities of daily living to receive appropriate training. This training shall consist of 40 hours of training. A staff member shall complete 20 hours, including six hours specific to dementia care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626 and four hours specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696, before working independently with residents. The remaining 20 hours shall include six hours specific to dementia care and shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. The training coursework may utilize various methods of instruction, including, but not limited to, lectures, instructional videos, and interactive online courses. The additional 16 hours shall be hands-on training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, facility did not ensure that staff were acquiring all required trainings per Health and Safety Code, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87203Type A

    87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement was is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, facility didn't ensure fire exit was unobstructed by installing chain lock on front door out of reach of non-ambulatory residents, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 16, 2023 inspection of NORTHERNCARE FACILITY?

This was a complaint inspection of NORTHERNCARE FACILITY on November 16, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to NORTHERNCARE FACILITY on November 16, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.