Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EHIMAS RESIDENTIAL CARELicense 3427009031 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC 9099.... The Doctor of Medicine (M.D. ) who reviewed R1’s computed tomography (CT) scan indicated that he could not definitively say when the injuries occurred or if they were a result of the same or different incidents. The M.D. stated that the fractures could have been a month to multiple months old and that they could have occurred at the same time or at different times. The M.D. stated that the cause of the fractures could have been falls, accidents, or direct blows. R1 moved into the facility in September of 2022. Staff reported that R1 was a fall risk and that he fell frequently. Records from the facility document that R1 fell on 11/19/2022, 11/29/2022, 12/16/2023, 12/24/2023, and 02/23/2023. Paramedics assessed R1 after the fall on 12/16/2023, but R1 was not taken to the hospital. Consumnes Fire Department Report #F202220234263 documents that facility staff (S1) signed the Patient Care Report and acknowledged refusal of transport. R1 was not assessed at the hospital until after the fall on 02/23/2023. According to facility staff and records, R1’s c are plan was never updated after he suffered any of his falls. Facility staff indicated that R1 was a fall risk beginning on the date of his admission. Fall prevention measures included reminding R1 to use his wheelchair or walker as well as providing extra visual supervision of him. Facility staff did not implement any other preventative actions to ensure that R1 did not suffer further falls. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the allegation of Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple injuries while in care is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding of substantiated means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. As a result of this investigation, deficiencies are being cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and a civil penalty for a repeat violation is being assessed. At the time of the complaint visit, the issuance of an additional Civil Penalty was still being determined and the licensee was informed that a civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code § 1569.49 . An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, appeal rights and confidential names list was provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(a)Type A

    ReappraisalsThe pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed the resident appraisal was not updated after R1 sustained multiple signficant falls. This poses an immediate risk to health safety and personal rights of residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(1)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Care...The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not as evidenced by: Based on the Consumnes Fire Department, Prehospital Care Report #F22234263, S1 signed an order for R1 not to be transported to the Emergency Department against medical advice. This poses an immediate risk to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities...residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:...To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted staff did not adequately supervise R1 resulting in multiple falls with serious bodily injury. This poses an immediate risk to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 17, 2023 inspection of EHIMAS RESIDENTIAL CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of EHIMAS RESIDENTIAL CARE on August 17, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to EHIMAS RESIDENTIAL CARE on August 17, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "ReappraisalsThe pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant chan..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.