complaint·August 29, 2025

LPA Gould met with R1 and attempted to explain the purpose of visit. LPA began to question R1 regarding food supply and R1's concern with food. R1's statements to LPA were not corroborated by LPAs observations of food supply. R1 grew increasingly agitated in LPAs presence and LPA exited the facility for safety purposes and R1 followed LPA to their vehicle. R1 was redirected inside by staff members. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of personal rights are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.