Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

SHERRY'S RCFELicense 3427011547 citations on this visit
7 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Sherry Ahuja and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon entry, LPA Moleski observed an individual working in the kitchen (S1). S1 identified themselves to LPA Moleski. S1 initially said they were at the facility visiting someone. LPA Moleski had already spoken with another staff member (S2), who said S1 started training last week. After LPA Moleski relayed this information to S1, S1 admitted that they were here for caregiver training. Ahuja said that S1 started training on either April 16 or 17. LPA Moleski observed in the facility garage a bed and personal effects. S1 said they had been sleeping in the bed, and that some of the effects were theirs. This facility is not cleared for residential use of the garage area. LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S1 does not have a criminal record clearance. S1 had no personnel record on file. Ahuja said she wanted to help out S1 by giving them a place to stay. LPA Moleski reviewed six resident files (R1-R6) and three staff files (S2-S4). S4's file did not contain an LIC 501, LIC 508, or first aid/CPR certification. LPA Moleski observed in a resident's file (R1) medical documentation showing that R1 visited the hospital on 2/10/25 due to a wound on R1's foot. According to Ahuja, a wound on R1's foot had gotten worse, and needed medical attention. R1 was placed on hospice care after this visit, according to Ahuja. LPA Moleski reviewed fax and email records and observed no incident report was received by the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) regarding this incident. Additionally, no notification was made when R1 started receiving hospice care. LPA Moleski observed in another resident's file (R2) medical documentation showing that R2 was hospitalized and placed on a 5150 hold on 3/13/25. According to Ahuja, R2 was hearing voices and was experiencing paranoia, so they were taken to the hospital. [continued on 809-C] LPA Moleski reviewed fax and email records and observed that no incident reports were received by CCLD regarding this incident. LPA Moleski observed in another resident's file (R4) medical documentation showing that R4 was sent to the hospital due to a lice infestation. CCLD received no incident report of this, according to fax and email records. While reviewing R4's medication administration records (MARs), LPA Moleski observed a lice treatment medication for R4 which was to be taken once per day, according to the MARs and according to the centrally stored medication records sent by R4's pharmacy. The medication was filled as of 3/11/25, according to the MARs. LPA Moleski observed that R1 received the medication at sporadic intervals, sometimes once every other day, once every two days, or with multiple days in between doses. S2 said that R4 did not receive the medication every day because R4 did not receive a shower every day. This facility has two scheduled shower days per week per resident. LPA Moleski asked for the prescription order for this medication, but Ahuja was not able to immediately produce it. Ahuja obtained an electronic copy and sent it to LPA Moleski. LPA Moleski toured the facility with Ahuja and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 76 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 103 degrees Fahrenheit, which is not within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S2) and one resident (R3).This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Sections 87202(a), 87355(e), 87465(a)(4), 87211(a)(1), 87303(e)(2), 87412(b), and 87632(d)(2). Due to a violation of fire clearance, an immediate civil penalty of $500 is hereby assessed. Due to a violation of criminal record clearance requirements, a civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day of S1's work and/or residence at this facility, with a maximum of 5 days, is hereby assessed. Civil penalties assessed during this visit total $1000. An exit interview was held with Ahuja. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Ahuja.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87202(a)Type A

    Maintain fire clearance before retaining specified persons

    Based on observation, S1 was living in the facility garage without an appropriate fire clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Report specified resident events within seven days

    Based on record review and interview, multiple incidents were not reported to CCLD, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Provide resident hot water for personal care

    Based on observation, water temperatures were not maintained within the required range, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)Type A

    Address and clearance obligations before facility work

    Based on observation and interview, S1 was working and/or residing in this facility since approximately April 17 without a criminal record clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(b)Type B

    Based on record review, at least one staff person's personnel record was not complete, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Assist residents with self-administered medication

    Based on record review and interview, a resident did not receive their daily medications, and that same resident was given medications without a prescription order on file, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Notification to department after hospice care starts

    Based on record review, notice of initiation of hospice services were not received by CCLD, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 22, 2025 inspection of SHERRY'S RCFE?

This was an inspection of SHERRY'S RCFE on April 22, 2025. 7 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 4 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SHERRY'S RCFE on April 22, 2025?

Yes, 7 citations were issued (3 Type A, 4 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation, S1 was living in the facility garage without an appropriate fire clearance, which poses an immedia..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an inspection. Inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.