Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

BEATRICE SENIOR CARELicense 3427011592 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Beatrice Clark and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon arrival, LPA Moleski observed two staff members (S1-S2) present and working. S2 identified themselves to LPA Moleski and said they had been working at this facility for six days. LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S2 is not associated to this facility but has an active criminal record clearance. Clark said that S2 actually only started working here on June 1, but that S2 moved in and has been living at this facility since May 30. 22 CCR Section 87355(e)(3) requires a transfer of criminal record clearances for all individuals not only working in licensed care facilities but also for all individuals residing in licensed care facilities. If S2 has been living at this facility since May 30, as Clark stated, then days in violation should start from that date. Therefore, five days are hereby assessed at a rate of $100 per day. This facility was previously cited for criminal record clearance requirements on 5/5/25. As this is a repeat violation, an additional civil penalty of $250 is hereby assessed. LPA Moleski cleared other unrelated citations from this facility's annual inspection on 5/5/25 during this visit. LPA Moleski reviewed staff files and observed that S1's file contained only their health screening and first aid certification. S2's file was missing a completed health screening. As this is a repeat violation, a civil penalty in the amount of $250 is hereby assessed. [continued on 809-C] Clark requested additional extensions for outstanding plans of correction regarding resident records and centrally stored records. No additional extensions will be granted, and LPA Moleski will return to assess additional civil penalties if these plans of correction are not submitted by 6/9/25. This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Sections 87355(e)(3) and 87412(a). Assessed civil penalties total $1000. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Clark.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(3)Type A

    (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) orThis requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, one staff member was not associated to this facility's roster prior to starting work, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(a)Type B

    (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information:This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, staff files for two staff were incomplete, which poses a potential health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

  • 87219(a)Type B

    “(a) Residents shall be encouraged to maintain and develop their quality of life through participation in a variety of planned activities. The activities made available shall include:” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, residents were not encouraged to participate in a variety of planned activities, which poses a potential health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

  • 87555(a)Type B

    “(a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents and shall meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council. All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner.” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and observations, food was not stored or prepared in a safe and healthful manner, which poses a potential health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 3, 2025 inspection of BEATRICE SENIOR CARE?

This was a other inspection of BEATRICE SENIOR CARE on June 3, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to BEATRICE SENIOR CARE on June 3, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prio..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.