Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Post-licensing visit

SACRAMENTO SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3427012307 citations on this visit
7 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a postlicensing inspection. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Salote Lewis and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed Lewis' file, a staff member's file (S1) and two resident files (R1-R2). This facility currently has two residents. R1 is age 75. R2 is age 34. Less than 75 percent of this facility's residents are over the age of 60. R1 was admitted on 8/8/23, according to R1's admission agreement. R1's admission agreement was not signed by R1 or a responsible party as of this visit date. R1's LIC 602 is dated 7/1/2022, which is more than a year prior to admission. R1's Identification and Emergency Information form is blank and is unsigned, and therefore did not contain a name, address, or phone number of a physician and dentist to be called in an emergency. Lewis said she had not received completed and signed documents back from R1's conservator. While reviewing medication administration records (MARs), LPA Moleski observed two missed doses for R1. R1 did not receive a nighttime dose of one medication on 8/8/23, and did not receive a midday dose of a different medication on 8/17/23, according to the MARs. LPA Moleski toured the facility with Lewis and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 70 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 116 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. [continued on 809-C] While inspecting a facility bathroom, LPA Moleski and Lewis observed a bottle of toilet bowl cleaner left in an unlocked cabinet. While inspecting the backyard, LPA Moleski and Lewis observed an unlocked shed containing unsecured cans of paint and bags of drywall joint compound. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S1) and two residents (R1-R2). This facility is being cited per the applicable 22 CCR Sections. An exit interview was held with Lewis. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Lewis.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87101(r)(5)Type B

    Based on review of resident records, the licensee did not ensure 75 percent of residents were aged 60 or older, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87309(a)Type A

    Ensure hazardous items are locked and not unattended

    Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure cleaning solutions, paint and drywall joint compound were inaccessible to residents, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87458(a)Type B

    Obtain baseline medical assessment before resident admission

    Based on review of R1's file, the licensee did not ensure the above documentation was completed, signed, and kept on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Assist residents with self-administered medication

    Based on review of R1's MARs, the licensee did not ensure doses were given as prescribed, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87506(b)(9)Type B

    Based on review of R1's file, the licensee did not ensure the above documentation was completed, signed, and kept on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87507(c)Type B

    Admission agreement signing and dating deadline

    Based on review of R1's file, the licensee did not ensure the above documentation was completed, signed, and kept on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Signed rights acknowledgement in resident record

    Based on review of R1's file, the licensee did not ensure the above documentation was completed, signed, and kept on file, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 21, 2023 inspection of SACRAMENTO SENIOR LIVING?

This was an other inspection of SACRAMENTO SENIOR LIVING on August 21, 2023. 7 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 5 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SACRAMENTO SENIOR LIVING on August 21, 2023?

Yes, 7 citations were issued (2 Type A, 5 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on review of resident records, the licensee did not ensure 75 percent of residents were aged 60 or older, which po..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.