Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 3427012511 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 09/19/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a case management visit. LPA Pascua was met by Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Alfredo Cruz and explained the purpose of the visit. Current census was 85. A brief interview with FDA Cruz and a tour of the facility was conducted. The purpose of this visit was to follow up on an incident regarding an elopement from the facility on 09/16/2024. On 09/17/2024, LPA Pascua received a phone call from the facility stating that R1 eloped from the facility. It was stated based on interviews of facility staff, R1 was last seen after dinner on 09/16/2024 around 9:00pm in the courtyard smoking. On 09/17/2024, facility staff checked on R1 in their bedroom where they were not found. At approximately 9:30am, staff notified the Facility Designated Administrator who stated that the facility staff conducted a perimeter search by foot. Additionally, the facility conducted a search in the surrounding areas via car and could not find R1. Staff then notified Sacramento Sheriff's office to report the missing resident. On 09/18/2024, LPA Pascua received notification that R1 was found by Sacramento Sheriff's Department approximately 2.8 miles away from the facility. R1 was evaluated by medical personnel to check their vitals and returned back to the facility before 12:00pm. Upon return to the facility, R1 was unaware that they left the facility and repeated stated their feet hurt. Facility staff conducted additional assessments and observed that R1 was unable to walk around by themselves and needed a wheelchair to ambulate to their room and had several blisters on their feet. It was stated by staff that R1 was able to ambulate and walk around themselves and did not have blisters on their feet prior to the elopement. LPA learned that the facility called Emergency Services and R1 was assessed and treated in the Emergency room and discharged with Home Health Services. LPA reviewed R1's physicians report and care plan which states that this resident has a diagnosis of dementia and was not able to leave the facility unattended with safety checks twice a day conducted by facility staff. It was stated by facility staff that safety checks are done during medication pass, incontinence care checks, however it was not clearly stated in the care plan. In addition, LPA reviewed the facilities staffing records for 09/16/2024 and it was learned that there were 3 staff members present during graveyard shift of which 2 staff members who were hired through an outside agency. It was unclear if the staff member assigned to R1's hall conducted health and safety checks during the course of their shift. R1's care plan also indicates that this resident needs consistent assistance due to disorientation and memory loss. An interview conducted with facility staff revealed that R1 had started showing tendencies to leave the facility to purchase additional cigarettes. Staff state that they worked with the responsible party to obtain additional cigarettes and was believed to help mitigate elopement tendencies. Based on the information gathered, the facility did not ensure that R1 was in secured environment based on the resident's LIC602's indication that R1 could not leave the facility and additional care and supervision needs due to their disorientation and memory loss. As a result, an immediate $500.00 civil penalty shall be assessed on September 19,2024 for bodily injury and severe pain, which posed an immediate threat to the Health, Safety, and Personal Rights of R1. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) – Title 22 – Division 6, Chapter 6, deficiencies were observed during today’s visit. Citations can be found on the LIC 809 – D. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal Rights were provided to facility. An exit interview was held, and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.312(d)Type A

    1569.312(d)Basic services requirements: Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may travel independently in the community. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on file reviews and interviews, the Licensee did not ensure staff were aware of R1 general whereabouts as R1 was last seen on 09/16/2024 and was not found in their room the next morning. R1 was found outside of the facility on 09/18/2024 by Sacramento Sheriff's department and returned R1 to the facility. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.

  • Report specified resident events within seven days

    (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case.This is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not ensure that the facility reported 22 incident reports within seven days of occurrence. LPA reviewed incident reports received by the department on 08/18/2024 and 08/19/2024 and found that the incidents occurred between the dates of 07/26/2024-07/31/2024 or 08/02/2024-08/08/2024 and were reported outside of the seven-day required period. This poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 19, 2024 inspection of SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was an other inspection of SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING on September 19, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING on September 19, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.312(d)Basic services requirements: Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may tra..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.