Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 342701251
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff also denied that any residents had been hospitalized due to medication mismanagement. A review of Resident 1’s (R1) MAR from July through November showed no discrepancies. R1’s seizure medications were administered as prescribed, with occasional refusals by R1 documented. According to R1’s LIC 624 Incident Report dated 09/17/2025, on 09/11/2025, paramedics were called after R1 was found on the floor in their room and reported feeling like vomiting; therefore, R1 was transported to the hospital. Hospital records indicate that R1 was admitted on 09/11/2025 due to a seizure and discharged on 09/12/2025. During two unannounced facility visits on 09/25/2025 and 11/17/2025, LPA Lee reviewed the medications of R1 and Resident 2 (R2) and found no discrepancies. Based on interviews and the record review conducted during the investigation, LPA Lee found no corroborating evidence that staff mismanaged residents’ medications resulting in hospitalization. Therefore, the allegation of medication mismanagement by staff is unsubstantiated. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director Corpus and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    Acceptance obligations tied to pre-admission appraisal needs

    87464(d) Basic Services(d) A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs... This was not met as evidenced by:Based on observation, review records and interviews, the licensee/administrator did not ensure that residents’ needs were being met by facility staff. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 25, 2025 inspection of SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING on November 25, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SIERRA LOMA ASSISTED LIVING on November 25, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.