Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

LEGACY LANE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 3427014142 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/4/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Cynthia Tamayo and Avelina Martinez conducted an unannounced Case Management -Deficiency visit to the facility. LPAs met with facility administrator Isikeli Tuikenatabua (S2) and explained the purpose of the visit. Interview statements from two staff (S1 and S2), it was learned that unassociated individuals. On two separate accounts LPAs were informed two unassociated individuals were present at the facility. It was reported P1 and P2 were present at the facility the on or around 9/23/25 and 12/4/25. It was discovered that P1 is the former administrator/licensee at facilities 342700499 342700440 and 342700730, which were closed as of July 2025.Upon guardian and LIS roster review, it was observed that P1 and P2 are on probation and not associated to Legacy Lane Senior Living. A civil penalty applies for having individuals who are excluded and/or not associated to the facility. During site visit on 12/4/25 around 9:00 AM,LPA Martinez observed P2 and two other unassociated individuals were present outside of the facility. It was confirmed P2 was present in the facility on 12/4/25 and LPAs were informed by facility staff that P2 is at the facility approximately once per week to assist with maintenance work, and they are also called to order supplies and materials needs at the facility. S2 stated R1 called them on 9/23/25, stating “something happened”. S2 stated they were not working at the facility on the week of 9/20/25 due to working at another facility (Vita Bella Elderly Care) and that is why S2 called P1, in order to ask them to come to the Legacy Lane Senior Living in order to have a female speak with R1. S2 stated there was no other administrator or designated responsible person on site, only care staff, so they called P1, whom is their former employer to come to Legacy lane in order to assist with speaking to R1. CONTINUED ON 809-C LPA Martinez spoke with S1 over the phone at around 10:35 AM and S1 confirmed they are in New York and have been out of the facility since May 2025 and will return "soon". They will contact LPA Martinez back with a return date. Licensee stated they understood an informal office meeting will be scheduled. Moreover, LPAs provided guidance on the following: Reporting requests for missed medications and advised staff to maintain an accurate refusal log, and update resident Re-appraisal if the last one was done over 12 months ago or there was a change of condition, whichever occurs first. A civil penalty shall be assessed on December 04, 2025 , in the amount of $200.00 due to background clearance violations (Criminal Record Clearance 87355(e)(2)). Refer to LIC 421BG form for additional information. As a result of this case management visit, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiency can be found on the LIC 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with S2, and a copy of these LIC 809 reports, LIC 809-D page, LIC 421BG, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87555(a)Type B

    Diet quality and preparation in safe healthful manner

    87555 General Food Service Requirements (a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents ... All food shall be selected, stored, prepared and served in a safe and healthful manner. This requirements was not met as evidenced by interview and observations made ofstaff not ensuring that resident's dietary needs are met. Additionally, It was observed that in between-meal nourishment or snacks were not made available for all residents in care. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • Obtain required California clearance or exemption

    "87355 Criminal Record Clearance(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record ... (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews the facility staff did not comply with the section cited above due to unassociated and excluded persons having been present in this facility. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87405(a)Type B

    Certified administrator requirements and substitute coverage

    "87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties d) The administrator shall ... (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review, observations, Administrator did not ensure all adults entering gthe facility shall have a criminal record clearance or exemption. P1 and P2 are not associated to the facility nor is there any personnel records for them at the facility.

  • Report specified resident events within seven days

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish… (1) A written report ... to the licensing agency and to the person responsible …(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident … this requirements was not met as evidenced by staff not reporting suspected abuse that was reported to them by resident 1(R1) on the week of 9/19/25. Additionally, staff did not complete the required SOC 341 form and failed to complete a telephone report shall be made to the local law enforcement agency within 24 hours of the mandated reporter observing, obtaining knowledge of, or suspecting the physical abuse, and a written report shall be made to the local ombudsman, the corresponding licensing agency, and the local law enforcement agency. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 4, 2025 inspection of LEGACY LANE SENIOR LIVING?

This was an other inspection of LEGACY LANE SENIOR LIVING on December 4, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LEGACY LANE SENIOR LIVING on December 4, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87555 General Food Service Requirements (a) The total daily diet shall be of the quality and in the quantity necessary t..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.