Complaint·January 15, 2026

Additional interview with facility staff (S2) stated that an eviction notice was requested from the admitting hospital care coordination team, but the facility was unable to provide the eviction notice issued by the licensee. LPA reviewed facility reports submitted to the Dept, however no written eviction notice for resident (R1) was received or on file with the Dept. This allegation was observed not in compliance with Title 22 regulation 87224(a) Eviction Procedures as the licensee did not ensure a written lawful eviction notice was provided to the resident. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED . A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Aisake and a copy of the LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D pages and appeal rights were provided to facility. LPA attempted to speak with resident (R1) but was unable as the resident was hospitalized at the time of the visit. LPA spoke with (R1) Home Health nurse, who stated that they are unsure that meals provided to resident in the facility is a direct result of an increased concern for R1’s on-going health needs. LPA reviewed R1’s discharge summary for resident (R1) dated 12/08/2025, which indicated that the resident’s diagnosis, however no dietary orders were indicated. There is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegation are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED . A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.