Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Health check

SUMERLIN GUEST HOME 2License 3427015143 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 05/01/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to conduct health and safety checks and to obtain an update on the closing of this facility. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meet with the Designated Facility Administrator. Staff called the Licensee and Ericson Serrano arrived shortly after. LPA conducted a tour of the facility. Two of the residents were sleeping, one was at the hospital, and this LPA interviewed the remaining resident (R1) about the notice of closure. R1 stated that no one had informed them of the closure. LPA requested a copy of R1's LIC 602 and observed that R1 had no diagnosis of cognitive impairment. The Administrator, Maria Caldeira, provided this LPA with a copy of the Notice of Closure and told her that all the responsible parties and residents would be provided with a copy on 04/23/26. During this visit, this LPA called and spoke to 2 of the responsible parties for 2 of the residents in care. Both (F1 and F2) stated that they did not receive anything in writing about the facility closing. They stated that they were informed the facility was changing ownership. LPA clarified that the facility was going through the closure process, that someone had applied for a license to potentially take over the facility, however there were no guarantees that the application for the license would be approved, or that it would be approved by the closing deadline of 06/17/26. While at the facility, a representative from a placement agency (A1) arrived to relocate one of the residents (R2). LPA interviewed the representative and learned that none of the 3 residents or their respective responsible parties were notified in writing about the closure, that they too were told that there was going to be a change of ownership. LPA requested the closure plan that was due on 04/22/26 and the updated assessments that were due on 04/24/26. The Licensee could not produce any of these documents upon request. LPA has cited for the following during today's visit: CCR 87205(a) Accountability of Licensee Governing Body CCR 87468.2(a)(7) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities CCR 87405(d) Administrator Qualifications According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no other deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit, a copy of this report was provided along with APPEAL RIGHTS and an exit interview was conducted with Serrano.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.626Type B
  • Store centrally held medications in locked secure place

  • 87205(a)Type B

    Licensee must supervise facility operations

    (a) The licensee...shall exercise general supervision over the affairs of the licensed facility... in conformance with these regulations and the welfare of the individuals it serves. The licensee did not meet the above requirement as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review, Licensee agreed to submit closure plan and updated assessments/care plans by 2/22/26 04/24/26. This posed/es a potential threat to the health, safety, and personal rights of residents in care.

  • 87405(d)Type A

    Required administrator qualifications listed in this subsection

    Administrator Qualifications 87405(d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1-7)... (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations... The Licensee did not ensure the above requirement was met as evidence by: Based on interviews with 2 responsible parties F1 and F2 along with the representative from the placement agency(A1) Responsible parties were not provided written notice of closure. This posed/es an immediate threat to the health, safety and personal rights of residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(7)Type A

    (7) To fully participate in planning their care.... The licensee shall provide necessary information and support to ensure...Based on observation and interview the Licensee did not ensure the above requirement was met as evidenced by Based on an interview with R1, R1 was not notified of the facility closure in writing or verbally thus not providing them information regarding their care, this posed an immediate risk to the health safety and personal rights of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 1, 2026 inspection of SUMERLIN GUEST HOME 2?

This was an other inspection of SUMERLIN GUEST HOME 2 on May 1, 2026. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SUMERLIN GUEST HOME 2 on May 1, 2026?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B).

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.