complaint·February 5, 2026

Interview with 3 out of 3 residents stated that they have no concerns about the facility nor staff. 2 out of 3 residents were not able to answer questions with full responses. R1 stated they have seizures and do not like going to the hospital. R1 stated their needs and being met and feel safe at the facility. R1 recalls they felt fine before going to day program on 1/2/26 the day in which he was off baseline when he arrived at day program and was sent to the hospital from Day Program. S1, S2, person 1 (P1), Person 2 (P2), and Person 3 (P3), all stated they notice R1 becomes less talkative and unresponsive when he has “episodes” or seizures and sometimes becomes confused or disoriented. P3 reported they noticed R1 is less talkative since moving to this facility and have some concerns over the staff’s ability to address resident's change in condition. P4 does think R1 was already off baseline the morning of 1/2/26. S2 stated they notice lack of sleep impacts R1’s seizure activity. It was reported R1 wanted to stay up late for new years eve in which they stayed up until 11:00 PM of which they were monitoring R1 closely for seizure warning signs the following days. S1 stated care staff is also trained on what seizure warning signs to look for. S1 stated IPP and IPP quarterlies are completed on a quarterly basis and will ensure to complete a re-appraisal if there is every a change in condition in between the quarterly care plan development with Alta Regional Center. LPA provided S1 and S2 with guidance on documenting, reporting requirements, immediate emergency treatment in emergency situations, and personal rights per Title 22. Record review shows the facility is maintaining daily notes to document changes in condition for residents. R1 was sent out to the hospital on 10/12/25,11/3/25, 11/26/25, 12/5/25, and 1/2/25 all due to R1 being off baseline. Based on interviews and observations, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies noted or cited per California Code Regulation, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with the facility administrator. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.