Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

**Report continued from 9099..... Allegation- Staff do not ensure residents receive meal services. Staff do not ensure residents receive feeding assistance. UNFOUNDED An investigation has been conducted regarding the above allegations. LPA observed the facility food supply as well as interviewed four residents regarding the food service. Based on observation and interviews, the facility keeps the required amount of food supply in the facility. Additionally, four residents’ interviews indicated that residents are satisfied with the food service at the facility and there were no concerns. During the facility tour, LPA observed the food menu for residents in the common area. Three staff interviews reflected that residents were satisfied with meal services and residents can choose alternatives if they do not like the food items served in the regular menu. Furthermore, staff delivered food trays to those residents who were unable to go to the dining room and assist residents with feeding who require assistance without any problems. Based on this information, these allegations are UNFOUNDED. Allegation- Staff do not ensure residents incontinence care needs are being met. Staff do not ensure residents catheter care is being provided in a timely matter. UNFOUNDED Based on interviews conducted with three staff and four residents, as well as the review of facility records, including charting notes, staff schedules, and resident records, it has been determined that the facility is meeting the resident's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) needs as required. The interviews with both staff and residents indicated that care was being provided in a professional manner, and no concerns were expressed. Based on these investigations, it has been concluded that the facility has enough staff to meet the residents' needs. Staff and residents interviews did not reflect any concern regarding resident’s toileting and any other care needs including catheter care. Based on this information, these allegations are UNFOUNDED. Allegation- Staff do not ensure residents receive adequate care with Hoyer transfers. UNFOUNDED Department interviewed three staff and four residents during complaint investigation. Department has reviewed facility records, including charting notes, staff schedule and resident records. Interviews and record review indicated that facility was following resident's physician's orders while transferring them. Residents and staff interviews indicated that facility has all transferring equipment's such as hoyer lift, sit to stand lift to transfer residents and all equipment's were in good working condition without any issues. Furthermore, staff get proper training in timely manner regarding safe transfer techniques for residents and can ask any questions from management in case they have any questions or issues to address in this area; therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. Based on the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above all allegations is found to be UNFOUNDED . A finding that the allegations are unfounded means that the allegations are false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit meeting conducted. A copy of this report has been provided to facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 80075(b)(5)(B)Type A

    80075 -Health Related Services (b)(5)(B) - Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions.... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on incident report, staff interviews and medication record review from the facility, It was determined that facility administered wrong medications to R1 which poses a immediate health and safety risks to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 26, 2026 inspection of CARLTON SENIOR LIVING ORANGEVALE?

This was a complaint inspection of CARLTON SENIOR LIVING ORANGEVALE on March 26, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CARLTON SENIOR LIVING ORANGEVALE on March 26, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.