Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

HAZEL HOME FOR SENIORSLicense 345002868
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. Allegation states resident (R1) is not following safety instructions, is performing jobs meant for caregivers and is in violation of Section 87224(a) and of the Resident Care Agreement signed on 02-10-2022. Hazel Home has communicated with resident on multiple occasions of their concerns about their behavior. \ LPA was provided on 4/5/22 with an email dated 3/28/22 from Licensee to R1's responsible party/POA serving her with 30 days notice to find another facility for R1, or by 4/27/22, since she is not happy with the facility. The email does not contain all of the required elements per Regulation 87224 so is not a valid eviction notice. Licensee contacted LPA by phone on 4/5/2022 to discuss issuing an eviction notice to resident (R1). Following the call, LPA emailed Licensee a copy of Regulation 87224, as well as a sample eviction notice. Licensee provided the Department with a copy of an eviction letter, on 4/6/2022 , which provides detailed information on (5) separate occasions, between 2/15/2022 and 3/13/2022, where resident was feeding another resident (R2), which posed a choking hazard to R2. Additionally, the letter notes that R1 was massaging R2's shoulders, on 2/22/2022 and on 3/27/2022, placing R1 at an increased fall risk. On 4/7/2022 , LPA provided additional guidance to Licensee that an eviction letter needs to contain resources for placement agencies and a sample eviction letter was provided again. LPA received an updated eviction notice on 4/7/22 and r eplied on 4/8/2022 that the letter appears to contain all required elements per the regulation and so is a lawful eviction notice . An updated eviction notice was issued by email to resident's representative later on 4/8/2 2. On 4/12/2022 , an in-person meeting was held at the facility with the Licensee, Administrator, resident (R1), R1's representative and the Ombudsman to discuss the eviction notice recently issued as well as other concerns. Copies of meeting notes were provided to the Department on 4/15/22 and note that at the conclusion of the meeting, the facility agreed to withdraw the eviction notice issued on 4/8/22 provided that 1) issues discussed at the meeting were not subsequently repeated and 2) all parties agreed to sign the meeting notes which state, in part, that any allegations previously made against the facility were false. Licensee confirmed on 4/19/22 and on 4/28/22 that the eviction notice issued on 4/8/22 had not been rescinded due to resident's responsible person not being willing to sign the meeting notes. Resident's POA indicated on 4/26/22 that she did not agree with the meeting notes, specifically about false allegations, so she was unwilling to sign and would be moving R1 to another facility. cont on 9099C(2).. 90099C(2) ..Regulation 87224 says (a) The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(a) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph (5). (3)Failure of the resident to comply with general policies of the facility. Said general policies must be in writing , must be for the purpose of making it possible for residents to live together and must be made part of the admission agreement. POA stated she never received a copy of the Admission Agreement or House Rules, as referenced in the eviction notice on 4/8/22. Licensee stated that House Rules were included in the Admission Agreement, which was signed by R1's POA upon move-in, on 2/10/2022, and that a resident can be evicted for placing him/herself in a harmful situation or another resident in a harmful situation. Admission Agreement says under Section 5(a) that a resident can be evicted for the reason of not following the written general policies of the facility. It was not anticipated that a resident would be trying to care for another resident, as in providing care like a caregiver, so it was not specifically written in until the admission policy was updated in May 2022. Based on information obtained during the investigation, LPA finds the allegation to be UNFOUNDED- A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 21, 2022 inspection of HAZEL HOME FOR SENIORS?

This was a complaint inspection of HAZEL HOME FOR SENIORS on July 21, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to HAZEL HOME FOR SENIORS on July 21, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.