Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

COGIR OF FOLSOMLicense 345002909
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff are mismanaging resident medication. Based on file review, it revealed R1 was prescribed Levetiracetam 500 mg tablet to be given one tablet by mouth, twice a day, effective date April 3, 2024. File review of R1's e-MAR, it revealed on April 25, 2024, one Levetiracetam tablet was administered at 9 a.m but not at 5 p.m as facility was "waiting refills". On April 26, 2024 at 9 a.m, it was recorded one Levetiracetam was administered, but then at 5 p.m Levetiracetam was not administered due to "waiting for delivery". Interview conducted with Health and Wellness Director revealed she was not working at the facility during this time in question and cannot explained why one dose was recorded as administered at 9 a.m on April 26, 2024 when it was pending on delivery as stated at 5 p.m. The Department finds the allegations to be SUBSTANTIATED - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Although the allegation was found to be substantiated, deficiency is not cited as LPA has cited facility for similar allegation in complaint control # 59-AS-20240610163326. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of the report and appeal rights provided to Executive Director.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) ... The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on file review, Licensee did not comply to the section cited above as R1 was not administered medications as prescribed, which posed a potential health and safety risk for residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 5, 2025 inspection of COGIR OF FOLSOM?

This was a complaint inspection of COGIR OF FOLSOM on February 5, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to COGIR OF FOLSOM on February 5, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.