Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

According to medical records, resident (R1) was sent out to the hospital on October 8, 2024, October 29, 2024, and November 23, 2024. Upon review of medical records, there was no indication that the facility did not seek timely medical attention for R1. Interviews with S2, home health nurse, administrator, and licensee indicated that, when R1 fell out of their bed on October 8, 2025, they were sent to the hospital. Home health records indicated that R1 was sent to the Emergency Room on October 8, 2024. Interview with S1 indicated that staff seek timely medical attention for residents by contacting emergency medical services or hospice services. Interviews with the home health nurse and administrator indicated that R1 was having constipation issues due to pain medication. Home health nurse indicated that R1 was receiving suppositories for constipation that were not working. Home health nurse and administrator indicated that R1 was sent to the hospital and prescribed a stool softener due to suppositories not working. Home health nurse and administrator indicated that a bowel movement (BM) chart was kept for R1. Facility provided R1’s BM chart for November 2024, which did not indicate any missed BM. On January 24, 2025, LPA conducted a medication count for residents (R4, R5, and R6), comparing the residents’ medication lists on file with medication centrally stored for the residents. LPA did not observe any medication errors. Interviews with R2 and R3 indicated that they receive all their medications as prescribed. Interviews with S1, S2, S3, and S4 indicated that all residents are receiving their medications as prescribed. Interview with the home health nurse indicated that they had no concern regarding the facility providing medications to residents as ordered. Interviews with S1, S2, S3, and S4 indicated that they have never witnessed staff handling residents in a rough manner. Interviews with R2 and R3 indicated that staff have never handled them too roughly and they have never witnessed staff handling other residents in a rough manner. Based on medication count, interviews conducted, and documentation obtained, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Report specified resident events within seven days

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified...This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation obtained, the facility did not submit an incident report regarding resident (R1) being sent to the emergency room on October 8,2024, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87412(a)(5)Type B

    87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information: (5) Home address and telephone number.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation obtained, the facility did not have complete personnel records for staff (S2, S3, S4, and S5), which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 13, 2025 inspection of SPLENDOR OF CARMICHAEL AT KEANE, LLC, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of SPLENDOR OF CARMICHAEL AT KEANE, LLC, THE on August 13, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SPLENDOR OF CARMICHAEL AT KEANE, LLC, THE on August 13, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.