Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CITRUS HEIGHTS TERRACELicense 3470014981 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

9099C(1)... RCC, who was not working at 7:30 pm, was contacted by facility staff and she went to the nearby gas station and surrounding area and learned that resident had asked for directions to the bus station. RCC located resident while driving down Antelope Rd and returned resident to the community at around 7:50 pm, uninjured. Resident stated to RCC that he "jumped the fence" in the outside patio area that faces the street. LPA reviewed resident's care plan that was updated on 6/29/2023 with additional notes added regarding wandering and elopement during the evening/sun downing hours. Physician's report, dated 6/26/2023, notes that resident is frequently confused and has increased agitation and confusion at night, due to sun downing, is not able to leave the facility unattended and needs constant medical supervision. Extra staff have been monitoring the resident during evening hours, and the resident has not tried to leave the facility again. Resident's family and physician were notified of the incident with a request that resident's medications be reviewed for a possible adjustment to the evening dosages. LPA observed the outside fence area where resident climbed over and observed an alarm on the patio door to sound when the door is opened. LPA spoke to Maintenance Director who confirmed that the batteries sometimes get low and they were replaced immediately following the incident on the (3) exit doors without a delayed egress alarm. Based on information obtained and reviewed, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (1) citation is issued on the 9099-D page. Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights provided. 9099A-C(1)... LIC624 states that R3 was taken to the ER for further medication evaluation since it was an unwitnessed fall and was prescribed Lidocaine for a scalp laceration. 48 hour alert charting was initiated following the incident for R2 and for R3 upon return from the hospital. LPA interviewed the Ombudsman following her investigation of the incident on 7/3/2023. The Ombudsman discussed the incident with RCC who indicated she had viewed the video surveillance and was informed R3 fell and was not pushed by R2 and R3 did not sustain any substantive injuries. The Administrator and RCC confirmed there were (4) staff working on shift during this incident. Med-Tech was administering night time medications and the (3) care staff were assisting with putting residents to bed. It is common that while staff is helping some residents, there are other residents who are sun downing in the common areas. Based on information obtained, staff responded as quickly as they heard R3 yell, and staff was not able to prevent this isolated incident. LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. Copy of report to Administrator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87705(j)Type A

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia(j) The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits, if exiting presents a hazard to any resident.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and observation, the LIcensee did not ensure that the auditory device on the patio exit door was working effectively, on 6/29/2023 (7:30 pm approximately) , to alert staff that resident (R1) had exited the the building, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 6, 2023 inspection of CITRUS HEIGHTS TERRACE?

This was a complaint inspection of CITRUS HEIGHTS TERRACE on July 6, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to CITRUS HEIGHTS TERRACE on July 6, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87705 Care of Persons with Dementia(j) The licensee shall have an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monito..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.