Complaint·November 6, 2024

The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home. LPA interviewed the alleged victim and could not obtain accurate information from R1 as their medical diagnosis and language barriers made it difficult to obtain information. LPA was able to have a translator who spoke a language identified to LPA and the translator had difficulty translating as they changed from several languages mid sentence and translator could not provide an accurate account of R1's statements to LPA. The RP and A1 interviewed were not present for the alleged incident. LPA inspected the facility and conducted a walk through of the facility and observed R1's bedroom which met all title 22 requirements. LPA obtained no evidence to support the allegations of physical plant. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Personal Rights and physical plant are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.