Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

IN LOVING HANDS CARE HOME IILicense 347004196
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

In November 2021 R1 was sent out to the emergency department due to a change of condition and was diagnosed with a stroke. Upon admission to the hospital resident was noted to have left ankle cellulitis. R1 remained in the hospital and then a skilled nursing facility (SNF) until returning to the facility on 12/21/21. LPA reviewed discharge paperwork from SNF which documented several skin conditions on R1 upon being discharged. R1 was sent out to the emergency department again on 1/4/22 due to change in condition. LPA reviewed hospital documentation, and there was no documentation indicating resident had an injury. Relevant Party indicates on 1/5/22 a bedsore was discovered. LPA spoke to a Homehealth representative, in which they stated R1 did not have a stageable wound and the skin tear was healing. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted. In November 2021 R1 was sent out to the emergency department due to a change of condition and was diagnosed with a stroke. Upon admission to the hospital resident was noted to have left ankle cellulitis. R1 remained in the hospital and then a skilled nursing facility (SNF) until returning to the facility on 12/21/21. LPA reviewed discharge paperwork from SNF which documented several skin conditions on R1 upon being discharged. Skin conditions documented are not a prohibited health care condition. LPA spoke to R1’s homehealth in which they stated client did not have a prohibited healthcare condition. R1 was sent out to the emergency department again on 1/4/22 due to change in condition. LPA reviewed hospital documentation, and there was no documentation indicating resident had a prohibited healthcare condition. LPA interviewed R1 in which they stated they feel facility staff are caring for them properly and indicated they have had skin issues on and off for many years. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be Unfounded. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 30, 2022 inspection of IN LOVING HANDS CARE HOME II?

This was a complaint inspection of IN LOVING HANDS CARE HOME II on March 30, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to IN LOVING HANDS CARE HOME II on March 30, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.