Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BRASWELLS YUCAIPA LEISURE MANORLicense 3609001001 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

adequately care for a resident's catheter. Based on evidence/record review/ interviews obtained during today’s visit, LPA has determined that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099) was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator. denied receiving an incorrect dosage of medications. R1 and Resident #2 (R2) stated that they are both getting all of their medications on time. R1, R2, and Resident #3 (R3) denied ever feeling over-medicated. LPA reviewed the facility's Medication Administration Record (MAR) in which it appeared that staff are administering medications appropriately. In regards to allegation #3, LPA interviewed R1, R2, and R3 who all stated that they receive three meals a day plus snacks in between meals. R1, R2, and R3 stated that they believe the meals provided are nutritious. LPA interviewed S1, S2, and S3 who all stated that all special diets and alternative food requests are accommodated. LPA observed that residents were eating a nutritious and sufficient portion of food at the time of visit. LPA also reviewed the facility's food menu in which it appeared that the facility was providing adequate food service for residents in care. In regards to allegation #4, LPA interviewed R1, R2, and R3 who stated that their rooms are comfortable. LPA conducted a walk-through of several rooms and buildings of the facility and observed that the room temperature was set between 74 degrees F and 75 degrees F. In regards to allegation #5, LPA interviewed S1 who stated that some time around Spring 2020, a water pipe had busted underneath a bathroom tub, which affected two rooms. S1 stated that the facility did have running water; however, the two rooms that were affected by the water pipe bursting did not have hot water According to S1 and S2, the residents in those two rooms had access to hot water in another bathroom down the hall. LPA tested the hot water in affected rooms in which it appeared hot water was being dispensed through the sink faucet. In regards to allegation #6, LPA interviewed S1, S2, and S3 who stated that all changes of condition are reported to appropriate persons. S1 and S2 both stated that the facility does not have an Independent Living building, only Assisted Living and Memory Care. S2 stated that Resident #4 (R4) did have a change in condition; however, R4 was immediately placed in a skilled nursing facility. In regards to allegation #7, LPA interviewed S2 and S3 who stated that hospice agencies do provide training for catheter care. S2 and S3 stated that facility staff only empty catheter bags; however, the resident's hospice agency will provide the rest of the care for a resident's catheter. S1 and S3 denied that staff did not that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 9099A) was discussed and a copy was provided to the Administrator.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(d)(3)Type B

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the ... (3) Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with S1 & S3, the licensee did not ensure that R1 was provided adequate supervision. This is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 20, 2021 inspection of BRASWELLS YUCAIPA LEISURE MANOR?

This was a complaint inspection of BRASWELLS YUCAIPA LEISURE MANOR on July 20, 2021. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to BRASWELLS YUCAIPA LEISURE MANOR on July 20, 2021?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411 Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience i..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.