Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson contacted the facility to conclude a complaint investigation. LPA identified herself and discussed the purpose of the call with Care Coordinator Araceli Soto. Regarding the allegation "Facility has scabies": It was alleged that residents who reside in rooms 102, 107, and 115 have scabies. Interviews conducted revealed Resident #1(R1), who resides in the memory care unit was suspected of having scabies last month but a skin scrape test was not performed to confirm such diagnosis. R1, along with all other memory care residents, as well as memory care staff were treated with Permethrin cream as a precautionary measure. R1 was also treated with oral medication. Neither R1 nor any other memory care residents reside in rooms 102, 107, or 115. For additional precautionary measures, the facility followed guidelines as outlined from the Centers for Disease Control in the care and management of scabies. To date, all precautionary scabies treatments have been completed and there are no current suspected cases. Records reviewed also indicated the facility reported the incident as required. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Facility has scabies". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided via email.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(22)Type B

    Enumerated rights- (a) Residents of resid- ential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (22)be pr- otected from involuntary...evictions in vio- lation of state laws and regulations..."inv- oluntary” means an...eviction that is initia- ted by the licensee, not by the resident. This requirement was not met as evidenc- ed by: The Licensee did not ensure R1 was provided a 30 day eviction notice as required by law. Based on interviews which were conducted, the facility refused to readmit R1 following thier hospitalization. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 3, 2021 inspection of MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING on May 3, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING on May 3, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.