Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the facility visit, LPA made three different attempts to interview R1 in her room, unsuccessfully. While doing so, LPA observed that on each occasion, residents' kept their door wide open. The room is on the bottom floor near the lobby. The door opens up to a busy hallway. Resident's use this hallway to get the court yard and dining rooms. It is alleged that staff did not dispense resident's medications as prescribed and medications are being falsely recorded as a refusal by resident. Staff interviews revealed that residents who are prescribed insulin receive their injections in the presence of a Medication Technician for the purposes of safety and security. Furthermore interview with S1 revealed that originally R1's medication was prescribed for 6am. S1 observed R1 was missing doses due to R1 being asleep at the time needed to take the medication. Record reviews revealed the prescription was modified. The time of the prescription was changed to a later time; allowing the resident to sleep in. LPA reviewed the facility's Medication Administration Record, (MARS) for R1. LPA observed no evidence indicating medications were not being administered as prescribed. Interview with R1 revealed that Medical Technician's used to bring the medications to her room, but that changed recently. Staff informed R1 she would need to go to the Medications Office to get her medications. She had no problem with the change, but a family member reported that she did not agree and expressed frustration. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, we have determined that these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative, where this report was reviewed, discussed then provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(e)(2)Type B

    87303 Maintenence and Operation (e)(2)Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Based on interviews and record reviews the Administrator did not insure the facility provided hot water to residents for personal care which poses a potential Health, Safety and Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 22, 2023 inspection of MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING on August 22, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MONTCLAIR ROYALE SENIOR LIVING on August 22, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.